“Every dog has its day… or century or two”: The end of the remittance basis of taxation etc PART TWO

Andy Wood • February 18, 2025

This is the second part in a 3-part series on "The End of the Remittance Basis of Taxation"

A dog with a wig on its head is sitting at a desk in a courtroom.
THE PRE 6 APRIL 2025 RULES 

Individuals 

So, what are these favourable rules that are being scrapped? 

Firstly, various changes have taken place to the non-dom / remittance basis rules over the years. Each sortie by the legislator taking its toll on the attractiveness of these rules. 

As such, I will look at some of the history which, I aver, it might be useful to know. So, let’s see what we can Golden Retrieve from the memory banks. 

Income tax and Capital Gains Tax (”CGT”) 

The remittance basis simply provides the non-dom taxpayer with the privilege of leaving his or her foreign income and gains (“FIG”) overseas without any tax being paid. If he or she leaves it overseas then there is no tax to pay. However, if he or she brings, enjoys or uses the funds in the UK then they will suffer tax to the extent that they do so. 

If it is foreign income that is ‘remitted’ then it will suffer UK income tax. If it is a foreign gain that is remitted then it will suffer CGT. When the funds remitted were ‘mixed’ then special rules would apply. 

In order to use the remittance basis, one must make an election and potentially pay a fee to use it1. The amount payable depends on how many years one has been resident in the UK: 
  • less than 7/9 tax years: the remittance basis is ‘free of charge’; 
  • between 7/9 tax years and 12/14 tax years: the remittance basis charge is £30k 
  • if one has been resident in the UK for 12/14 or more tax years and 17/20 tax years then one must pay 60k. 

Prior to 2017, there was another tier of 17/20 tax years at which point the Remittance Basis Charge was £90k. However, this was scrapped when that years Finance Act created a long-stop date of being able to use the remittance basis of 15/20 tax years after which the ability to use the remittance basis was pulled (this was known as being deemed domiciled for income tax and CGT purposes). 

A taxpayer had flexibility to choose whether to pay the Remittance Basis Charge in one year and not another. It would simply be a ‘cost v benefit’ calculation for a particular tax year.  

Inheritance Tax (“IHT”) 

Under pre 6 April 2025 rules, IHT primarily looked one’s domicile position rather than residence. 

The position is that if one is domiciled in the UK then you pay UK IHT on worldwide assets. Whether that person is non-resident at the point of death is largely unimportant (unless also franked by valid claims to be non-UK domiciled). 

A non-domiciled (and non-deemed) individual is subject to IHT on UK assets only.  

Prior to 2017, a non-dom who had been resident in the UK for 17 out of 20 tax years would become ‘deemed domiciled’ for IHT purposes only. However, with the concept of ‘deemed domiciled’ being introduced for income tax and CGT as well, the threshold became 15/20 tax years across the board. 

The rules for trusts 

The concept of protected trusts was introduced in 2017. 

Let us first remind ourselves of the framework that preceded that one. 

The Pre-2017 position 

The basic position before 2017 was that a non-UK trust (other than in respect of UK residential property from April 2015) did not pay UK CGT regardless of where the asset was located. This is based on the fundamental jurisdictional basis of UK CGT. 

However, such a simple rule – which would be open to significant abuse if existed in isolation – was bolstered by a plethora of anti-avoidance rules2.  

Prior to 2017, those anti-avoidance rules: 
  • looked to attach the gains of the trust to a UK settlor under certain circumstances; or 
  • alternatively, looked to attach the gains of the trust to a UK beneficiary. 

Under those rules, where a settlor retained an interest (for ease, let’s say they may still benefit from the trust property) under a non-UK trust then the tax position depended on the settlor’s domicile position: 

  • a UK domiciled settlor: taxed on the trust gains as they arise (under TCGA1992, s86; 
  • a non-dom settlor was not 

Where the trust was not settlor interested then the anti-avoidance code switched its beady eyes to the beneficiaries of the trust.  

Specifically, it looked to see whether there was a link between the beneficiary and the UK: 

  • If the beneficiary was UK resident and domiciled then capital payments (or benefits) he or she received were matched with any trust gains and the beneficiary pays tax; 
  • If the beneficiary was non-dom then, he or she was only taxable (in respect of any capital payments or benefits matched with trust gains) on the remittance basis; 
  • If the beneficiary was non-dom and non-resident then the provisions (TCGA 1992, s87) were unlikely to impose a charge (subject to other anti-avoidance rules). 

IHT for trusts 

Under the pre-April 2025 rules, trusts established by non-domiciled individuals would benefit from the attractive excluded property regime to the extent that property in the trust was of a non-UK situs.  

Broadly, such property is outside of the scope of UK IHT status to the extent that the trustees hold non-UK assets. In addition, this includes trust property being outside of the Relevant Property Trust regime (eg 10 year / exit charge) for trusts. 

As to whether trust property was excluded property the domicile status of the settlor was tested only at the time the trust was established. So, if the settlor subsequently became deemed domiciled for IHT purposes, this did not matter. The trust property remained excluded property and outside of any person’s estate and was no relevant property. 

Finally, the Gift with Reservation of Benefit Rules (“GWROB”) were trumped by the excluded property rules. This meant that the settlor could retain an interest but the value of the assets would remain outside his or her estate. 

B.I.N.G.O. 

The position between April 2017 – 5 April 2025 & Protected trusts 

The basic position for trusts – whether considering income or capital gains - was no different to that which existed prior to 2017. 

However, again, the complications came when it comes to the anti-avoidance provisions at work. As we have seen above, under the previous rules, relief was given where non-doms were the settlors of such trusts and / or where such people received benefits from said trust. 

The rules between 2017-2025 had some additional problems to grapple. This was because it was in 2017 that the concept of ‘deemed domicile’ was introduced for income tax and CGT purposes. In other words, a long stop date to the benefits a non-dom can obtain. 

Of course, for those non-domiciled individuals who had set up trusts before they became deemed domiciled under the new rules, removing the reliefs described above from the trust anti-avoidance provisions would be a massive rug-pull. 

This ‘protected trust’ relief applied to those who set up trusts whilst non-dom but who became ‘deemed-dom’ in years from 2017/18 onwards. 

Under the CGT trust protections, s86 generally did not apply where a settlor became deemed domiciled under the new rules. This meant that whilst value is left within the trust there will be a gross roll up of gains. 

Instead, the tax position focused on capital payments or benefits actually paid out to beneficiaries. 

The tax treatment depended on which category of person the payment or benefit is made to: 

  • Close family members (spouses, co-habitees, minor children, not grandchildren): 
  • Other persons 

Where receipt is by a close family member then, if they were subject to tax on the receipt, then that was that. If not, for instance they were non-resident, then the Settlor was liable for tax. 

If the receipt was by an ‘other person’ then the tax position was dependent on the recipient’s status. Of course, if it is the settlor then he will pay tax based on his own position. 

Illustration – Protected trusts and CGT summary 

A diagram showing how a person can get a loan

The income tax protections broadly reflected the CGT position outlined above. 


If the income within the trust was UK income, then the settlor would be taxed on this income regardless (as is the current position) under the s624 settlements code. 


Where there was foreign income and there was a UK resident deemed domicile person and a protected trust then we are essentially in the same position as outlined for CGT purposes. In other words, it depended on the position of the recipient as to the tax consequences. 


Illustration – Protected trusts and income tax summary 

A diagram showing how a non-uk trust works

IHT and Trusts 


One notable change in 2017 was that value represented by holdings of UK residential property could no longer be excluded property. 


As such, even in a trust where all the other assets were excluded property, value attributable to UK residential property would be taxable. 


In Part 3 of our three-part series, we look at the new regime for Foreign Income and Gains and the key changes to trust taxation.


Go to Part 3 Read Part 1
September 16, 2025
Discover how to apply for a UAE Partner Visa and prepare for relocation to Dubai. Expert tax, company setup, property, and wealth support from Mosaic Chambers Group.
September 11, 2025
Who Are the HENRYs? HENRYs—an acronym for High Earners, Not Rich Yet—represent individuals or households with substantial incomes but little net wealth or savings. HENRYs typically earn between $250,000 and $500,000, yet struggle to build significant wealth due to high expenses and obligations In the UK context, HENRYs generally earn over £100,000, but find themselves stretched thin by rising costs, taxes, and societal expectations A detailed view highlights the paradox: high salaries masked by minimal savings, persistent debt, and heavy financial responsibilities, making many HENRYs still feel like they’re living paycheck to paycheck “Despite earning salaries over £100,000 … many Britons — now dubbed ‘Henrys’ … are struggling financially.” Times Why It’s Difficult Being a HENRY in the UK Punitive Tax Structures Earning over £100,000 results in the gradual loss of personal allowance, leading to marginal tax rates up to 60–71%, when combined with national insurance and student loan repayments Loss of Family Benefits Crossing income thresholds often disqualifies HENRYs from benefits like tax-free childcare, further increasing household costs Lifestyle Creep & High Fixed Costs Many HENRYs live in high-cost areas, shoulder big mortgages or rent, pay for childcare, and support family members. These pressures leave little room for savings or investments Five Practical Fixes for HENRYs 1. Set Clear Financial Goals Define short- and long-term objectives (e.g. early retirement, buying property, relocation) to guide your financial decisions 2. Track and Control Expenses Use budgeting tools or spreadsheets to identify unnecessary spending and reinforce disciplined financial habits 3. Automate Savings & Investments Automating transfers to savings, ISAs, or pensions ensures consistent wealth-building, even without active effort 4. Proactive Tax Planning Work with advisers to reduce tax liabilities through pension contributions, ISAs, or bespoke strategies. This can keep more income working for you 5. Seek Professional Advice Financial planners can help HENRYs manage complexity—pension strategies, legacy planning, investment advice, and global mobility for expatriates Is Relocating Abroad the Solution? For HENRYs, moving abroad may offer a chance to stretch income further, but it comes with pros and cons. Advantages Tax incentives and lower cost of living in destinations like Portugal, UAE, or Singapore could improve saving potential and lifestyle quality. Expat financial services and advisers specialise in tax optimisation, wealth protection, and cross-border planning Considerations Visa and residency costs, potential language or cultural barriers, and the need for local compliance can complicate relocation. Healthcare, schooling, and lifestyle preferences may vary dramatically by country. Not every foreign jurisdiction offers strong pension or investment environments suited to long-term planning. For those favouring staying in the UK, cost-of-living pressures and high taxation can still be mitigated with proactive wealth strategies and advisory support. Final Thoughts Being a HENRY doesn’t mean you’re on a clear path to wealth, even with a six-figure income. The combination of high taxes, lifestyle demands, and complex financial obligations means smart planning is vital. Whether you choose to stay in the UK or explore opportunities abroad, your focus should be on building wealth, not just earning. Take action today: define your goals, track your spending, automate your savings, plan your taxes, and seek expert guidance. Feeling like a HENRY? High salary, but wealth isn’t growing? Our global advisers can help, whether you want to stay in the UK with smarter tax and wealth strategies or explore relocation options abroad for lower taxes and a better lifestyle.
More Posts