“Every dog has its day… or century or two”: The end of the remittance basis of taxation etc PART TWO
Andy Wood • February 18, 2025
This is the second part in a 3-part series on "The End of the Remittance Basis of Taxation"
THE PRE 6 APRIL 2025 RULES
Individuals
So, what are these favourable rules that are being scrapped?
Firstly, various changes have taken place to the non-dom / remittance basis rules over the years. Each sortie by the legislator taking its toll on the attractiveness of these rules.
As such, I will look at some of the history which, I aver, it might be useful to know. So, let’s see what we can Golden Retrieve from the memory banks.
Income tax and Capital Gains Tax (”CGT”)
The remittance basis simply provides the non-dom taxpayer with the privilege of leaving his or her foreign income and gains (“FIG”) overseas without any tax being paid. If he or she leaves it overseas then there is no tax to pay. However, if he or she brings, enjoys or uses the funds in the UK then they will suffer tax to the extent that they do so.
If it is foreign income that is ‘remitted’ then it will suffer UK income tax. If it is a foreign gain that is remitted then it will suffer CGT. When the funds remitted were ‘mixed’ then special rules would apply.
In order to use the remittance basis, one must make an election and potentially pay a fee to use it1. The amount payable depends on how many years one has been resident in the UK:
- less than 7/9 tax years: the remittance basis is ‘free of charge’;
- between 7/9 tax years and 12/14 tax years: the remittance basis charge is £30k
- if one has been resident in the UK for 12/14 or more tax years and 17/20 tax years then one must pay 60k.
Prior to 2017, there was another tier of 17/20 tax years at which point the Remittance Basis Charge was £90k. However, this was scrapped when that years Finance Act created a long-stop date of being able to use the remittance basis of 15/20 tax years after which the ability to use the remittance basis was pulled (this was known as being deemed domiciled for income tax and CGT purposes).
A taxpayer had flexibility to choose whether to pay the Remittance Basis Charge in one year and not another. It would simply be a ‘cost v benefit’ calculation for a particular tax year.
Inheritance Tax (“IHT”)
Under pre 6 April 2025 rules, IHT primarily looked one’s domicile position rather than residence.
The position is that if one is domiciled in the UK then you pay UK IHT on worldwide assets. Whether that person is non-resident at the point of death is largely unimportant (unless also franked by valid claims to be non-UK domiciled).
A non-domiciled (and non-deemed) individual is subject to IHT on UK assets only.
Prior to 2017, a non-dom who had been resident in the UK for 17 out of 20 tax years would become ‘deemed domiciled’ for IHT purposes only. However, with the concept of ‘deemed domiciled’ being introduced for income tax and CGT as well, the threshold became 15/20 tax years across the board.
The rules for trusts
The concept of protected trusts was introduced in 2017.
Let us first remind ourselves of the framework that preceded that one.
The Pre-2017 position
The basic position before 2017 was that a non-UK trust (other than in respect of UK residential property from April 2015) did not pay UK CGT regardless of where the asset was located. This is based on the fundamental jurisdictional basis of UK CGT.
However, such a simple rule – which would be open to significant abuse if existed in isolation – was bolstered by a plethora of anti-avoidance rules2.
Prior to 2017, those anti-avoidance rules:
- looked to attach the gains of the trust to a UK settlor under certain circumstances; or
- alternatively, looked to attach the gains of the trust to a UK beneficiary.
Under those rules, where a settlor retained an interest (for ease, let’s say they may still benefit from the trust property) under a non-UK trust then the tax position depended on the settlor’s domicile position:
- a UK domiciled settlor: taxed on the trust gains as they arise (under TCGA1992, s86;
- a non-dom settlor was not
Where the trust was not settlor interested then the anti-avoidance code switched its beady eyes to the beneficiaries of the trust.
Specifically, it looked to see whether there was a link between the beneficiary and the UK:
- If the beneficiary was UK resident and domiciled then capital payments (or benefits) he or she received were matched with any trust gains and the beneficiary pays tax;
- If the beneficiary was non-dom then, he or she was only taxable (in respect of any capital payments or benefits matched with trust gains) on the remittance basis;
- If the beneficiary was non-dom and non-resident then the provisions (TCGA 1992, s87) were unlikely to impose a charge (subject to other anti-avoidance rules).
IHT for trusts
Under the pre-April 2025 rules, trusts established by non-domiciled individuals would benefit from the attractive excluded property regime to the extent that property in the trust was of a non-UK situs.
Broadly, such property is outside of the scope of UK IHT status to the extent that the trustees hold non-UK assets. In addition, this includes trust property being outside of the Relevant Property Trust regime (eg 10 year / exit charge) for trusts.
As to whether trust property was excluded property the domicile status of the settlor was tested only at the time the trust was established. So, if the settlor subsequently became deemed domiciled for IHT purposes, this did not matter. The trust property remained excluded property and outside of any person’s estate and was no relevant property.
Finally, the Gift with Reservation of Benefit Rules (“GWROB”) were trumped by the excluded property rules. This meant that the settlor could retain an interest but the value of the assets would remain outside his or her estate.
B.I.N.G.O.
The position between April 2017 – 5 April 2025 & Protected trusts
The basic position for trusts – whether considering income or capital gains - was no different to that which existed prior to 2017.
However, again, the complications came when it comes to the anti-avoidance provisions at work. As we have seen above, under the previous rules, relief was given where non-doms were the settlors of such trusts and / or where such people received benefits from said trust.
The rules between 2017-2025 had some additional problems to grapple. This was because it was in 2017 that the concept of ‘deemed domicile’ was introduced for income tax and CGT purposes. In other words, a long stop date to the benefits a non-dom can obtain.
Of course, for those non-domiciled individuals who had set up trusts before they became deemed domiciled under the new rules, removing the reliefs described above from the trust anti-avoidance provisions would be a massive rug-pull.
This ‘protected trust’ relief applied to those who set up trusts whilst non-dom but who became ‘deemed-dom’ in years from 2017/18 onwards.
Under the CGT trust protections, s86 generally did not apply where a settlor became deemed domiciled under the new rules. This meant that whilst value is left within the trust
there will be a gross roll up of gains.
Instead, the tax position focused on capital payments or benefits actually paid out to beneficiaries.
The tax treatment depended on which category of person the payment or benefit is made to:
- Close family members (spouses, co-habitees, minor children, not grandchildren):
- Other persons
Where receipt is by a close family member then, if they were subject to tax on the receipt, then that was that. If not, for instance they were non-resident, then the Settlor was liable for tax.
If the receipt was by an ‘other person’ then the tax position was dependent on the recipient’s status. Of course, if it is the settlor then he will pay tax based on his own position.
Illustration – Protected trusts and CGT summary
The income tax protections broadly reflected the CGT position outlined above.
If the income within the trust was UK income, then the settlor would be taxed on this income regardless (as is the current position) under the s624 settlements code.
Where there was foreign income and there was a UK resident deemed domicile person and a protected trust then we are essentially in the same position as outlined for CGT purposes. In other words, it depended on the position of the recipient as to the tax consequences.
Illustration – Protected trusts and income tax summary
IHT and Trusts
One notable change in 2017 was that value represented by holdings of UK residential property could no longer be excluded property.
As such, even in a trust where all the other assets were excluded property, value attributable to UK residential property would be taxable.
In Part 3 of our three-part series, we look at the new regime for Foreign Income and Gains and the key changes to trust taxation.
Dubai continues to attract high-net-worth individuals from the UK and around the world. Its tax efficiency, strong infrastructure and international business environment make it an appealing base for both personal wealth and global business operations. However, relocating or investing in Dubai without proper planning can lead to costly mistakes. Understanding the legal, financial and cultural environment before making decisions is essential. Below are some of the most common pitfalls HNWIs should avoid when relocating to Dubai in 2026... Overlooking Tax Planning A common misconception is that living in Dubai means there are no tax considerations. While the UAE has no personal income tax, the regulatory environment has evolved in recent years. The introduction of UAE corporate tax, VAT and international tax reporting requirements means individuals with businesses, investments or global income streams still need structured tax planning. Those relocating from the UK must also consider the implications of the Statutory Residence Test, potential split-year treatment and double taxation agreements. Failing to structure finances properly before relocating can create unnecessary tax exposure in multiple jurisdictions. Rushing Property Investments Dubai’s real estate market offers strong opportunities, but it also requires careful due diligence. Off-plan property purchases in particular should be approached cautiously. Buyers should review the developer’s track record, financial strength and delivery history. Market cycles are also important to consider, especially as increased supply in certain areas could lead to price corrections in the future. Taking time to assess location, developer credibility and long-term demand helps protect capital and avoid poorly performing investments. Underestimating the Real Costs of Property Ownership The advertised purchase price is only part of the financial commitment when buying property in Dubai. Investors should also factor in: The Dubai Land Department (DLD) transfer fee of 4% Ongoing service charges for buildings or communities Maintenance and management costs Ignoring these costs can significantly impact overall investment returns. Failing to Prepare for Banking Requirements Opening bank accounts in the UAE can be more complex than many expect, particularly for international clients. Banks require extensive documentation to comply with international anti-money laundering regulations. If financial structures or documentation are unclear, accounts can be delayed, restricted or even frozen. Ensuring all financial arrangements are transparent and properly structured before relocation makes the process significantly smoother. Misunderstanding Residency and Visa Options Many individuals assume residency can be arranged later or through temporary arrangements. In reality, visa planning should be part of the relocation strategy from the outset. For example, long-term residency options such as the UAE Golden Visa have specific investment and eligibility criteria. Understanding these requirements early allows individuals to structure investments and assets accordingly. Ignoring Local Laws and Regulations Dubai is known for its safety and order, but this is supported by a strict legal framework. Actions that might be overlooked elsewhere, such as offensive language, inappropriate social media content or public intoxication, can carry significant legal consequences. Financial transactions and business activities are also closely regulated. Taking time to understand the legal environment helps avoid unnecessary issues. Underestimating Cultural and Lifestyle Differences Dubai is an international city, but it operates within a framework of local customs and expectations. Respect for public behaviour, dress standards in certain locations and cultural sensitivity are all important. Practical factors such as the extreme summer climate can also affect lifestyle choices and property decisions. Understanding these aspects helps individuals settle comfortably and avoid unnecessary challenges. How Mosaic Chambers Group Can Help Relocating to Dubai is rarely just about moving location. It involves tax planning, asset structuring, property considerations, residency strategy and cross-border compliance. At Mosaic Chambers Group, we support high-net-worth individuals and entrepreneurs with the strategic planning needed to relocate with confidence. Through our international network of tax advisers, legal specialists and relocation partners, we help clients: Structure their affairs before leaving the UK Manage cross-border tax exposure Understand residency and visa options Conduct proper due diligence on investments Establish compliant financial and banking arrangements Careful planning at the outset can prevent costly mistakes later. If you are considering relocating to Dubai in 2026, speak to Mosaic Chambers Group to ensure your move is structured correctly from day one. Contact Us
How internationally mobile high-net-worth individuals structure global income while managing tax exposure across jurisdictions such as the UK and UAE.