BUDGET 2024: Trimming the fluff and the baggage – EOTs and EBTs
Andy Wood • November 1, 2024
BUDGET 2024: Trimming the fluff and the baggage – EOTs and EBTs
It seems odd to group these things together.
Employee Ownership Trusts are warm and fluffy. Encouraged by government to increase employee ownership. A cynic might say loved by business owners looking for a tax efficient exit.
Whereas Employee Benefit Trusts are the thing of nightmares. They carry more baggage than an average Swissport employee.
But they are very much cut from the same cloth.
Budget 2024 announced restrictions in the application of both.
Let’s take a butchers.
Employee Ownership Trusts (“EOTs”)
What is an EOT?
Employee Ownership Trusts (EOTs) were introduced under the Finance Act 2014 to promote indirect employee ownership by allowing employees to collectively own shares through a trust.
In theory, this model incentivises employees by enabling them to benefit from the company’s success, which can enhance employee motivation, retention, and overall company growth.
In addition, and of interest to the business owner, EOTs come with specific tax reliefs: capital gains tax (CGT) relief on share disposals, inheritance tax (IHT) relief, and income tax relief on employee bonuses.
The CGT relief allows owners to transfer a controlling share (over 50%) of their business into an EOT without triggering CGT, provided the company meets certain conditions, such as being actively trading and equally benefiting all employees.
It is not an exemption, but a form of holdover relief. Meaning the trustees essentially pick up the tab for the historic gain when they come to sell.
IHT relief is also available for shares transferred into an EOT, making it exempt from charges typically associated with trusts. With the restrictions to BPR announced in the Budget, this might become more attractive for new EOTs going forward.
Additionally, employees of EOT-owned companies can receive annual bonuses up to £3,600 tax-free. regulations, professional advice is recommended for companies considering this structure.
The changes to EOTs in summary
The Chartered Institute of Taxation, for some reason, has had a bee in its bonnet about EOTs for the last few years and it might be said these changes are, at least in part, down to their lobbying.
- Control: There will be a restriction on former owners (and those connected with them) from retaining control of companies' post-sale to the EOT by virtue of control (direct or indirect) of the Trust. This will be a problem for vendors who want to control from beyond the sale.
- Trustees must be UK resident: This means that the trustees cannot benefit from a tax-free eventual sale by being non-resident. As such, this ensures that the CGT relief is merely a deferral and not avoidance. The trustees will pick up the tab which will, ultimately, be borne by the employee beneficiaries.
- Fair market value consideration: the trustees must take reasonable steps to ensure that the consideration paid to acquire the company shares does not exceed market value. I am amazed that trustees are not already doing this.
- Clawback period extended: the ‘vendor clawback period’ if the Employee Ownership Trust conditions are breached post-sale, will now not end until the fourth tax year following the end of the tax year of disposal
- Reporting: the claim for CGT relief must include details of the sale proceeds and the number of employees of the company at the time of disposal
- Income tax distributions: Legislation will clarify that certain payments, including where the company makes payments to the trustees to repay consideration left outstanding to the vendors, is not taxed as a distribution.
The changes had immediate effect (e.g. for disposals to the EOT from 30 October 2024 onwards).
Employee Benefit Trusts (“EBTs”)
Introduction
Darkness descends. A wolf howls in the distance. A shiver runs down your spine. Yes, its EBTs folks.
However, despite their use for PAYE and corporation tax, EBTs have remained interesting for capital tax planning reasons – whether for IHT purposes of CGT purposes.
The shares in a genuine business (note, not necessarily trading) could be transferred to an EBT (without the bells and whistles of the EOT) without it being a transfer of value and without an immediate CGT charge where certain conditions were satisfied. These conditions being less onerous than the EOT.
Again, with the curtailing of BPR and BADR, they will remain so in the future. However, one will need to be more and more careful, and the scenarios they will be appropriate have probably reduced somewhat as a result of the Budget.
Let’s take a peep… from behind the sofa.
The Budget 2024 changes
The changes can be summarised as follows:
- ensure that the restrictions on connected persons benefiting from an Employee Benefit Trust must apply for the lifetime of the trust
- restrict the Inheritance Tax exemption to where the shares have been held for two years prior to settlement into an Employee Benefit Trust — where there has been a share reorganisation, the shares previously held will be taken into account in considering the two-year holding period
- ensure that no more than 25% of employees who can receive income payments should be connected to the participator in order for the Employee Benefit Trust to benefit from favourable tax treatment
The first of these is unlikely to be a problem – other than for pretty egregious planning which has already been fingered by the GAAR Advisory Panel.
You could probably say the same about the second one.
The third may have more practical reasons and is likely to mean that EBTs, for these purposes, will have to be used for businesses which have, and are prepared to benefit, a more diverse cohort of employee beneficiaries.
Discover how to apply for a UAE Partner Visa and prepare for relocation to Dubai. Expert tax, company setup, property, and wealth support from Mosaic Chambers Group.
Who Are the HENRYs? HENRYs—an acronym for High Earners, Not Rich Yet—represent individuals or households with substantial incomes but little net wealth or savings. HENRYs typically earn between $250,000 and $500,000, yet struggle to build significant wealth due to high expenses and obligations In the UK context, HENRYs generally earn over £100,000, but find themselves stretched thin by rising costs, taxes, and societal expectations A detailed view highlights the paradox: high salaries masked by minimal savings, persistent debt, and heavy financial responsibilities, making many HENRYs still feel like they’re living paycheck to paycheck “Despite earning salaries over £100,000 … many Britons — now dubbed ‘Henrys’ … are struggling financially.” Times Why It’s Difficult Being a HENRY in the UK Punitive Tax Structures Earning over £100,000 results in the gradual loss of personal allowance, leading to marginal tax rates up to 60–71%, when combined with national insurance and student loan repayments Loss of Family Benefits Crossing income thresholds often disqualifies HENRYs from benefits like tax-free childcare, further increasing household costs Lifestyle Creep & High Fixed Costs Many HENRYs live in high-cost areas, shoulder big mortgages or rent, pay for childcare, and support family members. These pressures leave little room for savings or investments Five Practical Fixes for HENRYs 1. Set Clear Financial Goals Define short- and long-term objectives (e.g. early retirement, buying property, relocation) to guide your financial decisions 2. Track and Control Expenses Use budgeting tools or spreadsheets to identify unnecessary spending and reinforce disciplined financial habits 3. Automate Savings & Investments Automating transfers to savings, ISAs, or pensions ensures consistent wealth-building, even without active effort 4. Proactive Tax Planning Work with advisers to reduce tax liabilities through pension contributions, ISAs, or bespoke strategies. This can keep more income working for you 5. Seek Professional Advice Financial planners can help HENRYs manage complexity—pension strategies, legacy planning, investment advice, and global mobility for expatriates Is Relocating Abroad the Solution? For HENRYs, moving abroad may offer a chance to stretch income further, but it comes with pros and cons. Advantages Tax incentives and lower cost of living in destinations like Portugal, UAE, or Singapore could improve saving potential and lifestyle quality. Expat financial services and advisers specialise in tax optimisation, wealth protection, and cross-border planning Considerations Visa and residency costs, potential language or cultural barriers, and the need for local compliance can complicate relocation. Healthcare, schooling, and lifestyle preferences may vary dramatically by country. Not every foreign jurisdiction offers strong pension or investment environments suited to long-term planning. For those favouring staying in the UK, cost-of-living pressures and high taxation can still be mitigated with proactive wealth strategies and advisory support. Final Thoughts Being a HENRY doesn’t mean you’re on a clear path to wealth, even with a six-figure income. The combination of high taxes, lifestyle demands, and complex financial obligations means smart planning is vital. Whether you choose to stay in the UK or explore opportunities abroad, your focus should be on building wealth, not just earning. Take action today: define your goals, track your spending, automate your savings, plan your taxes, and seek expert guidance. Feeling like a HENRY? High salary, but wealth isn’t growing? Our global advisers can help, whether you want to stay in the UK with smarter tax and wealth strategies or explore relocation options abroad for lower taxes and a better lifestyle.